Comments for Mudlet http://www.mudlet.org The Mud Client Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:32:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Mac Mudlet 1.0.5 now here by Degree http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/mac-mudlet-1-0-5-now-here/comment-page-1/#comment-660 Degree Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:32:46 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=417#comment-660 I am so impressed I had to save it so I continously go back and read things I may have skimmed I am so impressed I had to save it so I continously go back and read things I may have skimmed

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Alex http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-658 Alex Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:41:25 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-658 Anti-aliasing looks particularly nice on fonts that are designed for subpixel smoothing, like Consolas. I think that with Courier New (my typical MUD font), I'd prefer no AA Anti-aliasing looks particularly nice on fonts that are designed for subpixel smoothing, like Consolas. I think that with Courier New (my typical MUD font), I’d prefer no AA

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Excelsi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-653 Excelsi Fri, 25 Dec 2009 06:13:30 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-653 With AA just looks more attractive. Without has slightly more readability but I can boost brightness to increase visibility. With AA just looks more attractive. Without has slightly more readability but I can boost brightness to increase visibility.

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Forral http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-652 Forral Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:36:40 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-652 Maybe my eyes are bad, but without anti-aliasing makes the colors look alot more vivid to be honest. Anyone else see that too? Maybe my eyes are bad, but without anti-aliasing makes the colors look alot more vivid to be honest. Anyone else see that too?

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Vadi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-650 Vadi Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:55:12 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-650 Oh it's there already since a long while! Just looking at the default setting, and anti-aliasing seems to be way ahead. Oh it’s there already since a long while!

Just looking at the default setting, and anti-aliasing seems to be way ahead.

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Chosig http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-649 Chosig Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:09:42 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-649 Put it in configuration :-) Put it in configuration :-)

]]> Comment on Quick poll – which kind of text in Mudlet do you prefer? by Izak Flash Man http://www.mudlet.org/2009/12/quick-poll-which-kind-of-text-in-mudlet-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1/#comment-646 Izak Flash Man Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:12:35 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=410#comment-646 Looks like the Withs have it. Lol. Looks like the Withs have it. Lol.

]]> Comment on Mudlet 1.0.1 release by Tom http://www.mudlet.org/2009/11/mudlet-1-0-1-release/comment-page-1/#comment-636 Tom Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:38:18 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=343#comment-636 Just wanted to take a moment and say that the work you have done on Mudlet is incredible. It is good to see such active development on a MUD client. Also has been interesting to learn Lua. Thanks so much! Just wanted to take a moment and say that the work you have done on Mudlet is incredible. It is good to see such active development on a MUD client. Also has been interesting to learn Lua. Thanks so much!

]]> Comment on Beta 15 & git changes by Polprav http://www.mudlet.org/2009/09/beta-15-git-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-630 Polprav Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:14:50 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=300#comment-630 Hello from Russia! Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you? Hello from Russia!
Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you?

]]> Comment on Beta 15 & git changes by Vadi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/09/beta-15-git-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-626 Vadi Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:55:50 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=300#comment-626 Its in the download section, but here is a fuller one I think: * new features & fixes & documentation update: notably: keep chains open, triggers firing for a set amount of following lines * faster enableTrigger(), disableTrigger() * disconnect(), reconnect(), getMudletHomeDir() functions * Fix: crash on xterm 256 color and more * Fix: chain heads with keepFiring > 0 will only run the script on the first run * Fix: Lua function killTimer() could cause a crash * Fix: button scripts within menus were executed multiple times * editor tab stop width reduced Its in the download section, but here is a fuller one I think:

* new features & fixes & documentation update: notably: keep chains open, triggers firing for a set amount of following lines
* faster enableTrigger(), disableTrigger()
* disconnect(), reconnect(), getMudletHomeDir() functions
* Fix: crash on xterm 256 color and more
* Fix: chain heads with keepFiring > 0 will only run the script on the first run
* Fix: Lua function killTimer() could cause a crash
* Fix: button scripts within menus were executed multiple times
* editor tab stop width reduced

]]> Comment on Beta 15 & git changes by Michael M. http://www.mudlet.org/2009/09/beta-15-git-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-623 Michael M. Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:51:27 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=300#comment-623 Is there a changelog available? Is there a changelog available?

]]> Comment on OS X Installer is now available for Mudlet by boz http://www.mudlet.org/2009/05/mudlet-on-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-611 boz Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:46:21 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=288#comment-611 Alright, I've got a small list of errors here..excuse me while I whine. First, the editing screen for triggers etc extends off screen, blanking out some items and making it unclosable. Secondly, it duplicates my triggers/aliases randomly, so I have like 20+ of the same trigger..which makes things get a little weird. Also, when I create a buggy alias/trigger/whatever, I have to delete and start over if I click away from it, I can't re-select it. Alright, I’ve got a small list of errors here..excuse me while I whine. First, the editing screen for triggers etc extends off screen, blanking out some items and making it unclosable. Secondly, it duplicates my triggers/aliases randomly, so I have like 20+ of the same trigger..which makes things get a little weird. Also, when I create a buggy alias/trigger/whatever, I have to delete and start over if I click away from it, I can’t re-select it.

]]> Comment on Mudlet Beta is now available! by Dylan http://www.mudlet.org/2009/03/mudlet-beta-yes-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-599 Dylan Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:23:41 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=272#comment-599 Oops, forgot to check the site for the key. Sorry, nevermind. Oops, forgot to check the site for the key. Sorry, nevermind.

]]> Comment on Mudlet Beta is now available! by Dylan http://www.mudlet.org/2009/03/mudlet-beta-yes-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-598 Dylan Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:23:43 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=272#comment-598 W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 6B8045AA69930E50 Looks like there is an error in the repos for Linux. Anyone else having problems? W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following signatures couldn’t be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 6B8045AA69930E50

Looks like there is an error in the repos for Linux. Anyone else having problems?

]]> Comment on Ubuntu PPA and .debs now available by Vadi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/ubuntu-ppa-and-debs-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-596 Vadi Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:29:21 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=221#comment-596 All fixed now! All fixed now!

]]> Comment on Ubuntu PPA and .debs now available by Vadi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/ubuntu-ppa-and-debs-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Vadi Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:06:20 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=221#comment-37 @Kalon: we fixed the issue, hang tight for an update. @Kalon: we fixed the issue, hang tight for an update.

]]> Comment on Ubuntu PPA and .debs now available by Kalon http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/ubuntu-ppa-and-debs-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Kalon Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:31:59 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=221#comment-36 err... correction: Ubuntu 8.10, my keyboard ate up a letter. err… correction: Ubuntu 8.10, my keyboard ate up a letter.

]]> Comment on Ubuntu PPA and .debs now available by Kalon http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/ubuntu-ppa-and-debs-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-35 Kalon Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:29:14 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=221#comment-35 I'm not sure whether this is an error on my part or a bug in the package, but when I tried to install from the repository Mudlet's output window became messy... Incoming text was recieved fine, but anything that was initiated by a command I sent wasn't started on a new line and seemed to have a buffer before it would appear on screen. To explain this more thoroughly, if I typed in a command that resulted in a one-line output, I wouldn't see the result until I either entered another command or recieved some other string from the mud. I tried uninstalling then compiling the source, and this is not an issue... I run Ubuntu 8.1, and at the time of the download I should have more than covered all the dependencies. I’m not sure whether this is an error on my part or a bug in the package, but when I tried to install from the repository Mudlet’s output window became messy… Incoming text was recieved fine, but anything that was initiated by a command I sent wasn’t started on a new line and seemed to have a buffer before it would appear on screen. To explain this more thoroughly, if I typed in a command that resulted in a one-line output, I wouldn’t see the result until I either entered another command or recieved some other string from the mud.

I tried uninstalling then compiling the source, and this is not an issue… I run Ubuntu 8.1, and at the time of the download I should have more than covered all the dependencies.

]]> Comment on Mudlet’s new fast display by Vadi http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/mudlets-new-fast-display/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Vadi Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:01:08 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=209#comment-34 Same as zmuds unfortunately - ~2 mins. I'll post up a video soon. Same as zmuds unfortunately – ~2 mins.

I’ll post up a video soon.

]]> Comment on Mudlet’s new fast display by Trevize http://www.mudlet.org/2009/01/mudlets-new-fast-display/comment-page-1/#comment-33 Trevize Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:29:06 +0000 http://www.mudlet.org/?p=209#comment-33 Very nice. One thing that always annoyed me about zMUD is how slow it was displaying. And the splitscreen is nice, it's the one thing MUSHclient lacks display-wise. What about speed comparison with MUSHClient? Very nice. One thing that always annoyed me about zMUD is how slow it was displaying. And the splitscreen is nice, it’s the one thing MUSHclient lacks display-wise. What about speed comparison with MUSHClient?

]]>